Market Insights

Redefining Power Conversion

May 11, 2020 by Alex Lidow

Beyond just performance and cost improvement, the most significant opportunity for GaN technology to impact the power conversion market comes from its intrinsic ability to integrate multiple devices on the same substrate.

GaN technology, as opposed to standard silicon IC technology, allows designers to implement monolithic power systems on a single chip in a more straightforward and cost-effective way.

Integrated circuits made using GaN-on-Si substrates have been in production for over five years. Since that time, GaN-based ICs have gone through various “phases” of integration from pure discrete devices to monolithic half-bridge devices, to power FETs that included their own monolithically integrated driver, and more recently, to fully monolithic power stages containing power FETs, drivers, level shifting circuits, logic, and protection.

 

Phase One Integration – Monolithic Half Bridges

The most common building block used in power conversion is the half-bridge. Half bridges are used in buck converters, boost converters, LLC converters, bus converters, motor drives, and many more converter topologies. Therefore, in September 2014, the first step towards a power system integrated onto one semiconductor substrate was taken when the monolithic half-bridge was introduced. The first of these devices, shown in Figure 1 (a), put both the high-side and low-side transistors onto one substrate.

The circuit equivalent of this half-bridge is shown in Figure 1 (b). The advantages of this integration included the reduction in size and cost, and by virtue of the close coupling of the two transistors, the parasitic common source inductances were also reduced. This last advantage increased switching speed and therefore enabled even faster-switching power conversion systems.

 

Image of an EPC2100 monolithic half-bridge measuring 6 mm x 2 mm

equivalent circuit diagram

Figure 1: (a) Image of an EPC2100 monolithic half-bridge measuring 6 mm x 2 mm, and (b) equivalent circuit diagram [2]

 

This was a good first step, however, users of GaN transistors or GaN half-bridge devices still had to add their own driver circuits. Texas Instruments, Silicon Labs, μPI Semiconductor, Murata Semiconductor, and several others introduced driver ICs made with traditional silicon processes that could easily interface with enhancement-mode GaN transistors. Unfortunately, the added size, and cost, as well as the added parasitic gate loop inductance of these drivers detracted from the ultimate potential for GaN in a power conversion system.

 

Phase Two Integration – Half-Bridge Plus Driver

To address the issue of external gate drivers, early in 2018 devices that added the driver onto the GaN transistor arrived with the device shown in Figure 2 (a), with the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 2 (b). In GaN, low voltage transistors can be fabricated with very short gate-drain separation alongside the 200 V power transistors. These GaN FET-plus-driver integrated circuits could be driven at multi-megahertz frequencies from simple CMOS logic, thus eliminating the need for a silicon driver IC.

 

Image of an EPC2112 monolithic GaN-on-Si FET with integrated driver measuring 1.1 mm x 2.9 mm

equivalent circuit diagram

Figure 2: (a) Image of an EPC2112 monolithic GaN-on-Si FET with integrated driver measuring 1.1 mm x 2.9 mm, and (b) equivalent circuit diagram

 

Phase Three Integration – ePower™ Stage

In early 2019 the driver function and the monolithic half-bridge were merged onto a single GaN-on-Si substrate along with a level shifter, synchronous boost circuit, protection and input logic as shown in Figures 3 (a) and 3 (b). This complete power stage, the ePower™ Stage, can be driven at multi-megahertz frequencies and controlled by a simple ground-referenced CMOS IC, and with just a few added passive components, it could become a complete DC-DC regulator. Figure 4 shows the efficiency of this monolithic power stage at 1 MHz and at 2.5 MHz in a 48 VIN – 12 VOUT buck converter.

 


Image of an EPC2152 monolithic ePower Stage measuring 3.9 mm x 2.6 mm

equivalent circuit diagram

Figure 3: (a) Image of an EPC2152 monolithic ePower Stage measuring 3.9 mm x 2.6 mm, and (b) equivalent circuit diagram
Efficiency vs. output current for a 48 VIN – 12 VOUT buck converter at both 1 MHz and at 2.5 MHz using the EPC2152 monolithic ePower Stage IC compared with the performance of the same circuit using discrete GaN transistors with a silicon half-bridge driver IC.
Figure 4: Efficiency vs. output current for a 48 VIN – 12 VOUT buck converter at both 1 MHz and at 2.5 MHz using the EPC2152 monolithic ePower Stage IC compared with the performance of the same circuit using discrete GaN transistors with a silicon half-bridge driver IC.

 

Figure 5 shows the basic cross-section of this ePower Stage IC. The two power FETs that form the high and low-side of the power stage are accompanied by low-voltage transistors. The level shift transistor on the far left must have the same voltage rating as the output FETs, but the signal-level devices used for driver and logic functions can have a lower voltage capability, and therefore a much smaller separation between the gate and drain electrodes. Not shown in this diagram are the numerous capacitors and resistors that complete the circuit.

 

Cross-section of a monolithic power stage showing high-side and low-side power devices with their accompanying low voltage driver and level shift devices
Figure 5: Cross-section of a monolithic power stage showing high-side and low-side power devices with their accompanying low voltage driver and level shift devices

 

The ePower™ Stage replaces at least three discrete chips; the gate driver plus two FETs making design and manufacturing easier. The device saves at least 33% of space on the printed circuit board compared to a discrete implementation as seen in Figure 6. This device makes it easy for designers to take advantage of the significant performance improvements made possible with GaN technology. Integrated devices in a single chip are easier to design, easier to layout, easier to assemble, save space on the PCB, and increase efficiency.

 

Comparison of discrete implementation of power stage for 48 V – 12 V buck converter vs. monolithic ePower™ Stage implementation. Integration provides 33% space savings on the PCB.
Figure 6: Comparison of discrete implementation of power stage for 48 V – 12 V buck converter vs. monolithic ePower™ Stage implementation. Integration provides 33% space savings on the PCB.

 

The Future

The monolithic power stage IC discussed in the previous section performs all the same basic functions as a multi-chip DrMOS module based on silicon MOSFETs, but at higher voltages, higher switching speed, lower cost, and in a smaller footprint. This, however, is only the beginning of the integration opportunities for GaN-on-Si devices. These first-generation power stages only include capacitors, resistors, and lateral n-channel FETs. Soon additional sensing of current and temperature can be added, along with circuit blocks such as references, comparators, and op-amps to construct an integrated controller plus output stage on a single chip. Multilevel topologies can also be integrated, thus enabling higher input voltages with lower voltage power devices.

Eventually, p-channel devices will also be monolithically integrated based on one of the many hopeful structures now in development. Once complimentary n- and p-channel devices can be integrated, CMOS circuitry will be possible, thus enabling the more efficient driver and logic circuits.

By going to very high frequencies – above 30 MHz – the size of passive components becomes so small that it will be possible to integrate all the components needed for a full power supply converter on a single chip. This will all happen, it’s just a question of time!

 

About the Author

Alex Lidow is CEO and co-founder of Efficient Power Conversion (EPC), former CEO of International Rectifier and is the co-inventor of the HEXFET power MOSFET, a power transistor. He has authored numerous peer-reviewed publications on related subjects, and received the 2015 SEMI Award for North America for the commercialization of more efficient power devices. Lidow was one of the lead representatives of the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) for the trade negotiations that resulted in the U.S. – Japan Trade Accord of 1986 and testified to Congress on multiple occasions on behalf of the industry.

 

This article originally appeared in the Bodo’s Power Systems magazine.