A
Like it says, I implemented a MC33063A switching regulator in a
design and wonder if there are any historical faulty issues with it?
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/mc34063a.pdf
I did some repetition cycling with it and did notice a couple
of times it looked like it went into a non-start up state?
When this happens and if you are using the Step up configuration, it
is advisable to supply a fusible link.. Because it put my bench supply
at full set current and the switcher wasn't operating.
But I can only get this to happen if I do radical cycling. I'll need to
study that closer to see if there is a way to incorporate some form of
power management circuit to help that out
design and wonder if there are any historical faulty issues with it?
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/mc34063a.pdf
I did some repetition cycling with it and did notice a couple
of times it looked like it went into a non-start up state?
When this happens and if you are using the Step up configuration, it
is advisable to supply a fusible link.. Because it put my bench supply
at full set current and the switcher wasn't operating.
But I can only get this to happen if I do radical cycling. I'll need to
study that closer to see if there is a way to incorporate some form of
power management circuit to help that out